ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Judicial Dialogue

Courts
International
Jurisprudence
Judicialisation
P195
Andreas von Staden
Universität Hamburg
Andreas Hofmann
Departments of Political Science and Public Administration, Universiteit Leiden
Law and Courts

Wednesday 10:30 - 12:15 BST (26/08/2020)

Abstract

Judicial Dialogue is one of the most widely used, while at the same time most contested, concepts in the research on law and courts. The interaction between domestic courts and the Court of Justice of the European Union is often labelled as a judicial dialogue, especially due to the existence of the unique preliminary ruling procedure. This panel revisits the concept seeking to analyse the mutual dependence between domestic courts and CJEU, describing its character, role perceptions of both CJEU and national judges, and the motives behind nurturing or withdrawing from the interaction.

Title Details
Explaining the Puzzle of Dutch Non-Referral to the CJEU of Economic Migration from Outside the EU View Paper Details
Network Analysis of Transjurisdictional Citations in Judicial Opinions: Sources of Persuasive Authority in the Inter-Court Dialogue View Paper Details
That's and Order! View Paper Details
The Referring Court’s Influence on the EU Court of Justice Judgment View Paper Details
Active or Passive: The National Judges’ Views on the Preliminary Ruling Procedure View Paper Details